The United States of America is often referred to as “the land of opportunity.” This country may indeed be a rich land of opportunity for many reasons, but certainly not when it comes to potato chips. For some reason, the U.S. is the blandest producer of potato chip flavors in the world. England, Canada, India… their chips swell
with flavorful pride. Here? All we’ve really got to call our own is BBQ, Sour Cream & Onion, perhaps some Cheddar, and endless riffs on the same. Why is it that our diverse melting pot palate is presumed to be one-dimensional when it comes to potato chips?
My guess is it's due to an ironic and reversed cultural phenomenon. The artisinal beer movement here has expanded in endless tributaries for years in a majority of states, and while top baseline brands Budweiser and Miller are somewhat holding their own, Michelob may soon vanish. This because today our evolving palates demand more than just generic, low-level beer, and why only the ultimate brands of that simple kind can survive in our currently thriving artisinal beer market.
Alternatively, tradition is a way of life in England, and their beer doesn't waver far off the beaten path. Per some research I did on the British beer market last year in grad school, experimental line extensions don't have high success rates there because people are happy with the tried and true brands and styles (aka Guinness, Carlsberg, and more Guinness). Yet go to any food-selling shop in London and you'll see much evidence of the British crisps flavor movement (crisps = what they call chips). One innovator is the Walkers company, maker of the fun-flavored (imho) Walkers Sensations. They feature flavor combos redolent of main course dinners: Roast Chicken & Thyme literally took me to a seat at Friday night dinner. If you close your eyes, the taste is certainly not far off.
Alternatively, tradition is a way of life in England, and their beer doesn't waver far off the beaten path. Per some research I did on the British beer market last year in grad school, experimental line extensions don't have high success rates there because people are happy with the tried and true brands and styles (aka Guinness, Carlsberg, and more Guinness). Yet go to any food-selling shop in London and you'll see much evidence of the British crisps flavor movement (crisps = what they call chips). One innovator is the Walkers company, maker of the fun-flavored (imho) Walkers Sensations. They feature flavor combos redolent of main course dinners: Roast Chicken & Thyme literally took me to a seat at Friday night dinner. If you close your eyes, the taste is certainly not far off.

At least Canada is closer to the U.S. than England. Recently a friend visited from Toronto with a bag of his favorite Ruffles with the flavor “All Dressed." They were extremely tasty, and who knows why—I can't make out if I tasted any of the specific ingredients shown on the label—but they certainly were terrific.
That's a lot of questions, and here's one more: Why do big-brand U.S. chip makers looking for a brand extension only make minor adjustments or “extreme” versions of the flavors in their arsenal? Speaking of which, I tried an extreme Doritos Cool Ranch chip once and felt my taste buds recoil into horrified submission. It's just too much. Flavors should be great because they taste good, not because they're louder.


Even though this is the land of opportunity, it seems too many things we eat are homogenized to fit the tastes of the masses. Of course that makes sense—economies of scale being what they are—but I'll bet if Lays started rolling out their Canadian flavors here, or Walkers had a co-brand agreement with Ruffles, the masses would embrace such potato chip flavor freedom and it would result a win-win for all.
Until we eat again,
Marly
No comments:
Post a Comment